subscribe: Posts | Comments

Draft RSE guidance letting girls down


RSE, consulation, Draft RSE guidance, EVAW Coalition, letter, letting girls down, DfE, petition, rapeThis is not what was promised and you ‘could do better’.

Last year the law was changed to make Relationships and Sex Education (‘RSE’) compulsory in all schools in England.

The government consultation on a ‘Draft RSE Guidance’ document which sets out what all schools should cover in these lessons closes on 7 November.

A coalition of women’s organisations has written to Education Secretary Damian Hinds MP saying that the government’s ‘Relationships and Sex Education’ (RSE) proposals are poor and will fail girls unless they are significantly amended and joined up to other school policies.

The End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW) believes it is woefully inadequate – it is not what was promised – it gives a green light to schools to pick and choose what they will cover – and it is not solid enough on the different forms of violence against women and girls and their connection to women’s inequality.

The Coalition is extremely concerned about the government’s proposals which:

permit faith schools to teach marriage only;

include repeated references to “self-control”, “managing peer pressure” and “resisting pressure to have sex”;

lack clarity on teaching the law on abuse and on equality – and make FGM and forced marriage optional areas of teaching;

make only single references to pornography and menstruation;

fail to make a strong enough link with the likelihood of young people disclosing abuse after lessons and being prepared for this in school;

continue to permit parents to withdraw children (up to the age of 15) from ‘sex education’.

Women’s groups fear that if implemented the proposed ‘Relationships and Sex Education’ statutory guidance will be a missed opportunity to ensure schools are part of efforts to end and prevent abuse of women and girls.

The proposals follow recent revelations that schools and local authorities are being sued for failing girls who have been raped at school.

In March 2017 a cross-party group of MPs worked together to change the law and make ‘Relationships and Sex Education’ compulsory in every school in England for the first time.

That 2017 change followed multiple inquiries and reports on child sexual exploitation, high levels of abuse in teen relationships, and endemic sexual harassment and assaults on girls in and out of school, as well as the widespread exposure of children and young people to online pornography.

And it was clear in 2017 that the ensuing statutory guidance had to ensure these issues were covered in detail, with adequate teacher training, and joining up with school child protection policies.

The EVAW Coalition has now made a detailed submission to the consultation on the draft guidance, highlighting concern about the proposals’ considerable deference to faith schools who are permitted to teach only very traditional notions of sexuality, marriage and relationships, and are not clearly required to cover different forms of abuse of women and girls, and how they are connected to women’s inequality and stereotypical roles.

The Coalition was particularly alarmed to read repeated references to teaching “virtues” including “self-control” and resisting/managing peer (sexual) pressure, which read along the lines of abstinence ideas, while giving no thought to the ongoing coercion which is already a reality in many girls’ lives, and what it is like to live with ongoing abuse and harassment.

And the failure to include enough guidance and advice to enable schools to prepare for disclosures of abuse following RE/RSE lessons is indicative of the failure to truly appreciate the prevalence of abuse, the context many girls live in and their right to protection and safety.

An anonymous mother who is petitioning the Department for Education (DfE) to radically improve its approach, said: “My daughter went through hell because her school failed to understand how to prevent sexual violence and how to deal with an allegation.

“If the Department for Education continues to abdicate responsibility for the safety of girls in schools, more and more girls will suffer.

“The RSE curriculum needs to be robust, comprehensive and for every child.

“Look me in the eye, the mother of a child rape survivor, and tell me that I could have kept her safe by educating her better. No, someone needed to educate the lad who raped her.

“It is negligent to pretend that we can rely on all parents doing this effectively.

“We need to stop being squeamish about sex and realise that sex education is about keeping children safe.

“It’s a health and safety issue, and there is no place for get-out clauses here.”

And EVAW Coalition’s co-director, Sarah Green, said: “Damian Hinds’ proposed ‘relationships and sex education’ guidance for schools is a significant climbdown and not in the spirit of what was promised last year.

“The law was changed because of widespread recognition by cross-party MPs and a large majority of the public that the reality of abuse, not least that enabled by technology, meant compulsory relationships and sex education had become a necessity.

“But the DfE’s proposals give a green light to schools whose leaders choose to teach only very traditional notions of sexuality, relationships and gender norms, and is generally squeamish about sex and sexuality.

“In 2018 we cannot continue to allow schools to pick and choose whether they permit young people to have lessons and discussion on sex and sexuality, respect, stereotypes about men and women, the law on consent, and LGBT equality.

“There’s no seriousness in what is proposed about ensuring ‘RSE’ is really part of dealing with the widespread sexual harassment of and sexual assaults against girls, even though parents are taking schools and local authorities to court when they have failed to protect.

“We urge MPs, teachers, young people and parents to let the government know – this is not what was promised and you ‘could do better’.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *