subscribe: Posts | Comments

Curb hate speech call from UN experts


open letter, 30 independent UN experts, curb hate speech‘The rhetoric of hatred must be countered, as it has real-life consequences.’

Thirty independent UN experts have joined together to publish an open letter calling on States and social media firms to take action to curb the spread of hate speech.

They warn that generalising and describing entire groups of people as dangerous or inferior was not new to human history and had clearly led to catastrophic tragedies in the past.

They had, they said, been receiving an increasing number of reports about hate speech and incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence, and felt it was time to speak out.

The letter runs:

We are alarmed by the recent increase in hateful messages and incitement to discrimination and hatred against migrants, minority groups and various ethnic groups, as well as the defenders of their rights, in numerous countries.

Hate speech, both online and offline, has exacerbated societal and racial tensions, inciting attacks with deadly consequences around the world.

It has become mainstream in political systems worldwide and threatens democratic values, social stability and peace.

Hate-fuelled ideas and advocacy coarsen public discourse and weaken the social fabric of countries.

Through international human rights law and principles, States have committed to combatting racial discrimination, racialized violence, and xenophobia.

These international human rights standards guarantee equality and non-discrimination rights and require States to take strong action against racist and xenophobic speech and to prohibit advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.

We are gravely concerned that leaders, senior government officials, politicians and other prominent figures spread fear among the public against migrants or those seen as “the others”, for their own political gain.

The demonization of entire groups of people as dangerous or inferior is not new to human history; it has led to catastrophic tragedies in the past.

Around the world, we observe that public figures are attempting to stoke ethnic tensions and violence by spreading hate speech targeting the vulnerable.

Such rhetoric aims to dehumanise minority groups and other targeted people, and, in the case of migrants, fosters discriminatory discourse about who “deserves” to be part of a community.

Furthermore, hateful calls for the suppression of non-normative sexual orientations and gender identities and a limitation of the human rights of LGBT people limit progress towards the eradication of violence and discrimination against LGBT persons in various countries around the world, and a number of discriminatory legal and policy initiatives have been put forward.

The rhetoric of hatred must be countered, as it has real-life consequences.

Studies have established a correlation between exposure to hate speech and the number of hate crimes committed.

To curb xenophobic attacks on migrants and prevent incitement to discrimination, hatred, hostility and violence against other marginalised groups, we call on public officials and politicians, as well as the media, to assume their collective responsibility to promote societies that are tolerant and inclusive.

To achieve this, they must refrain from any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.

They should also denounce swiftly those who incite hatred against migrants, minorities, or other vulnerable groups.

This is not a call for further restriction on freedom of expression, which is under attack worldwide; we call for just the opposite, the promotion of free expression.

Freedom of expression serves as a vital tool to counter hate speech, and yet those same public figures who deploy hateful rhetoric often seek to restrict individual rights to speak and respond and defend themselves and their ideas.

It is of crucial importance that States ensure that the three-part test for restrictions to freedom of expression – legality, proportionality and necessity –also applies to cases of incitement to hatred.

We are concerned about the abuse of “hate speech” as a term to undermine legitimate dissent and urge States to address the core problems addressed by human rights law while promoting rights to privacy, culture, non-discrimination, public protest and peaceful assembly, public participation, freedom of religion and belief, and the freedom of opinion and expression.

We urge them to follow the standards adopted in the Rabat Plan of Action and to participate actively in the Istanbul Process to counter the intolerance we see worldwide.

We call on States to double their efforts to hold accountable those who have incited or perpetrated violence against migrants and other vulnerable groups.

Traditional and social media companies should exercise due diligence to ensure that they do not provide platforms for hate speech and for incitement to hatred and violence.

States should actively work towards policies that guarantee the rights to equality and non-discrimination and freedom of expression, as well as the right to live a life free of violence through the promotion of tolerance, diversity and pluralistic views; these are the centre of pluralistic and democratic societies.

We believe that these efforts will help make countries safer, and foster the inclusive and peaceful societies that we would all like and deserve to live in.

Signed by:

– the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, Mr. Felipe González Morales;

– the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Mr. David Kaye;

– the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Mr. Ahmed Shaheed;

– the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Ms E. Tendayi Achiume;

– the Special Rapporteur on minority issues, Mr. Fernand de Varennes;

– the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Mr. Michel Forst;

– the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, Mr. Victor Madrigal-Borloz;

– the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms Dubravka Simonovic;

– the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children, Ms Maria Grazia Giammarinaro;

– the Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order, Mr. Livingstone Sewanyana;

– the Independent expert on human rights and international solidarity, Mr. Obiora C. Okafor;

– the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Mr. Fabian Salvioli;

– the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Mr. Philip Alston;

– the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Ms Agnes Callamard;

– the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Ms Fionnuala Ní Aoláin;

– the Working Group on discrimination against women and girls;

– the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises;

– the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent;

– the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia, Ms Rhona Smith;

– the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mr. Javaid Rehman;

– the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Mali, Mr. Alioune Tine;

– the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Ms Yanghee Lee;

– the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, Mr. Michael Lynk and

– the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia, Mr. Bahame Tom Mukirya Nyanduga.

Special Rapporteurs, Independent Experts and Working Groups are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world.

Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organisation and serve in their individual capacity.

To join the campaign to stand up for human rights, click here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *